I know I said I’d post daily about the stupid I find on the internet but, honestly, some days there’s just so much stupid that I can’t keep up. And other days I just need a break from the internet.
Today there is so much in the news about the Markles trying to be just like the rest of us and failing spectacularly. Also we have a new prime minister who talks the talk but can she walk the walk? That remains to be seen.
There’s lots of stories about murders and programmes being made about old murder cases. Plane crashes, car crashes and awards ceremonies that might as well be car crashes. Except for Brendan Fraser and his new movie. Can’t wait to see it. Always liked him since George of the Jungle. Brilliant film!
But then I came across this story in the ever faithful DM. In case you can’t be bothered to click on the link, it’s a story about a woman who bought a Cricut machine and has been creating iron-on logos for her teenage son’s clothes. Bragging online that you’re infringing copyrights from some of the biggest brand names out there surely isn’t the brightest thing to do? But that seems to be the logic from people these days. What’s worse is that she’s feeding into her kid’s future problems when he can’t afford legitimate brand named clothing so will probably fake or steal it if it’s that important to him. This, at best, is very bad parenting.
As someone who detests anything branded (except Ford and maybe Apple products) I certainly don’t go out of my way to shove these things in other people’s faces and I certainly wouldn’t produce items with their logos on and brag to the nation that I was saving money on authentic products by producing my own versions. I suspect we’ll be hearing soon how she’s getting “cease and desist” letters from the corporate lawyers for these firms. And it would serve her right. Ignorance is no defence.
I know copyright is a very complicated and, sometimes, grey area but the general rule is seek permission from the copyright and/or trademark holder first. I’m sure if she did this they would never have agreed to let her do what she’s doing. As much as I hate corporate greed, it’s still theft when someone takes money from a company by producing fakes. Regardless of whether or not she’s selling the items to make profit or just using them for her son, she should have sought legal permission and definitely not plastered it all over social media. Aside from anything else, now all her son’s friends know he’s wearing illegal fakes and if that doesn’t heap on the ridicule and bullying then I don’t know what will. Very irresponsible on all levels.
But that seems to be the nature of internet – or rather social media – addicts. They really aren’t a clever bunch are they!